COMPAS PSE turns graduate readiness, role criteria, evidence gaps, interview preparation, and advising actions into structured records career centres can review, explain, and report on.
Relevant coursework and project evidence documented
Role-specific examples require stronger framing
Interview proof points not yet prepared
Verify strongest evidence examples before rewriting the student-facing narrative.
Advisors make judgement calls every day. The challenge is that readiness, evidence, role fit, interview preparation, and next steps are often documented differently across advisors, faculties, and programmes.
Can the graduate show evidence against the role they are targeting — not just present a polished resume?
Which strengths are documented, which claims need verification, and which gaps are only framing issues?
Can the advisor, student, programme lead, or review team understand what was assessed and what changed?
COMPAS turns one graduate evaluation into the documents students, advisors, and institutional leaders need before, during, and after support.
A structured advisor-facing record showing fit, evidence quality, gaps, readiness status, and next-session priorities.
A plain-language roadmap that turns the evaluation into specific resume updates, evidence tasks, and interview preparation.
Practice questions, success signals, and watch areas tied to documented readiness gaps — not generic mock interview prompts.
A reviewable record of what was assessed, what changed, and which cohort-level gaps are appearing across advising sessions.
COMPAS turns student information, target roles, documented evidence, advisor review, and next steps into one governed readiness record.
Student background, resume, target role, advising context, and programme goals are captured in one structured record.
Role criteria are mapped to graduate evidence, documentation gaps, readiness signals, and support needs.
The advisor sees what is strong, what is missing, what requires verification, and what should happen next.
Advisor records, student plans, interview notes, and programme documentation are generated from the same record.
Outputs are tied to role criteria, evidence, readiness status, advisor review, and next action — not generic resume advice.
Student shows relevant academic and project evidence. Overall readiness remains Amber because interview examples and role-specific proof need strengthening.
Amber
Red
Required
The same structured process supports every student, every advisor, and every programme review.
Collect the graduate profile, target role, resume, constraints, and advising objective.
Separate required criteria, preferred criteria, readiness indicators, and review areas.
Distinguish documented strengths from assumptions, missing proof, and weak framing.
Give the advisor a clear agenda for what to verify, strengthen, or avoid overstating.
Produce student-facing and institution-facing outputs from the same governed evaluation.
COMPAS helps career centres keep readiness evaluation structured, evidence-led, student-aware, and reviewable across advisors and programmes.
COMPAS structures the evaluation record. Advisors remain responsible for final guidance and student support decisions.
The system distinguishes documented readiness from unsupported claims, missing proof, and role-specific verification needs.
Each action connects back to a criterion, evidence gap, readiness signal, or advising objective.
Teams use the same evaluation structure without forcing every student into the same support path.
Receive clear, actionable next steps based on the role they are pursuing.
Use one consistent evaluation structure without losing professional judgement.
Gain structured readiness signals that can support reporting and continuous improvement.
No. It gives advisors a structured readiness record so the conversation starts with evidence, not guesswork.
No. Resume positioning is one output. The core value is role-fit evaluation, evidence review, interview readiness, and outcome documentation.
Yes. Student-facing actions are written in plain language and tied to what the student can improve, verify, practise, or prepare.
Each session creates structured fields that can inform readiness patterns, advising impact, cohort gaps, and programme-level review.
Yes. COMPAS evaluates against the target role criteria, so the same structure can support business, health, technology, trades, arts, and other pathways.
An advisor record, student action plan, interview readiness notes, and institutional documentation generated from one governed evaluation.
COMPAS PSE helps career centres turn graduate readiness into structured, explainable records and practical next steps.
Career advisors remain responsible for final guidance and student support decisions.